DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH< & >Side Bars<
& The Top Bar for >PAGES<
& The Top Bar for >PAGES<
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY:
For any adverts that may follow this,
in text or at the end
which may well be inappropriate, biased,
propaganda or fraudulent
or even perhaps offensive.
I regret we have no control over adverts
or their number, which may be displayed!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY:
For any adverts that may follow this,
in text or at the end
which may well be inappropriate, biased,
propaganda or fraudulent
or even perhaps offensive.
I regret we have no control over adverts
or their number, which may be displayed!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Do note there is Zero
Consequential Scientific Evidence
of any Manmade Global Climate Crisis.
Do See the Oregon Declaration http://www.petitionproject.org/
.
ANALYSIS: Climate Scientist Says It’s ‘Unreasonable’ to Call Climate Change an Existential Threat
MIT Professor Richard Lindzen has asserted that calling climate change an existential threat comes from propaganda …
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW GL-W
GLW Documents
eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.co
The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK
follow me on:
TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
&
https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW
FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100018379395297
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
one has to wonder if John Kerry is a deliberate liar and fraud or just staggeringly stupid and gullible!
ANALYSIS: Climate Scientist Says It’s ‘Unreasonable’ to Call Climate Change an Existential Threat
MIT Professor Richard Lindzen has asserted that calling climate change an existential threat comes from propaganda
An MIT scientist has said that although the global temperature rise owing to a greenhouse effect is real, the increase is small and does not pose any existential threat.
The greenhouse effect is primarily caused by water vapor and clouds, said Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
“We’re dealing with changes for a doubling of CO2 on the order of between breakfast and lunch,” he said.
According to NASA, the greenhouse effect is “the process through which heat is trapped near Earth’s surface by substances known as ‘greenhouse gases.’ Greenhouse gases consist of carbon dioxide, methane, ozone, nitrous oxide, chlorofluorocarbons, and water vapor.”
Politicians, universities, international organizations, and media have called climate warming an existential threat to humanity.
Mr. Lindzen asserted that calling climate change an existential threat comes from propaganda.
Extreme Climate Change of the Past
There is also an argument that during major climate changes in Earth’s history, the global mean temperature change was only five degrees, implying that warming by “three degrees could be something serious,” Mr. Lindzen said.He referred to two climate change events when the mean temperature difference between these two periods and today was only about five degrees.
One of the events was the Last Glacial Maximum, also known as the last ice age, when Illinois was covered with an ice sheet about 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) thick.
The second event was the warm period about 50 million years ago when alligator-like creatures were living on Svalbard, a Norwegian archipelago located north of the Arctic Circle.
During this hot period about 55–56 million years ago, the global mean temperature “appears to be” higher than today’s temperature by about seven degrees Celsius (13 degrees Fahrenheit), reaching 73 degrees Fahrenheit, NOAA said.
During these periods, the temperature in the tropics remained almost constant while the temperature difference between the tropics and the pole increased by 20 degrees Celsius during the Last Glacial Maximum and decreased by 20 degrees Celsius during the warm period, the scientist pointed out.
On the other hand, the temperature increase since the pre-industrial age owing to the greenhouse effect observed today remains the same in every place from tropics to pole, Mr. Lindzen explained.
“The tropics-to-pole temperature difference depends on the dynamics of the heat transport by motion. To some extent, the equator depends on the greenhouse effect,” he said.
The increase we are seeing could be attributed to CO2—about a degree—but it is not changing from tropics to pole, Mr. Lindzen asserted, calling the idea that this temperature shift is “existential” and requires massive mitigation “unreasonable.”
Is CO2 Dangerous?
CO2 reduction is “the dream of a regulator,” Mr. Lindzen said. “If you control CO2, you control breathing; if you control breathing, you control everything. So this always is one temptation.”“The other temptation is the energy sector. No matter how much you clean fossil fuels, they will always produce water vapor and CO2,” Mr. Lindzen explained.
CO2 is being treated as a poison and most people believe that CO2 is dangerous, the scientist continued, but they forget that CO2 is essential.
“The concentration of CO2 in your mouth is about 40,000 parts per million as opposed to 400 outside,” Mr. Lindzen said. A concentration of “5,000 is permitted on a space station.”
“It’s hardly a poison—but worse than that—it’s essential. If you could get rid of 60 percent of the CO2 roughly, we’d all be dead.”
“This is a very strange pollutant; it’s essential for plant life,” Mr. Lindzen said. “Yet, because it is the inevitable product of fossil fuel burning in the energy sector, it’s being attacked.”
Science Is Used to Advance Climate Change Policies
The IPCC produces reports on climate change that are often thousands of pages long. The institution also releases general summaries for policymakers and “iconic statements” that summarize thousands of pages in one sentence, Mr. Lindzen said.Working Group I is tasked with assessing the physical science of climate change, according to its website.
One of the iconic statements by IPCC asserted that it was “almost certain that most of the climate change—the warming—since 1960 was due to man,” Mr. Lindzen said, explaining that “if it were even all of it, you’re talking about a fraction of a degree.”
Yet Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) considered this conclusion “the smoking gun” and wanted to do something in response, Mr. Lindzen said.
Most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely attributable to human activities, in particular “to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations,” the report said.
The report also provides a projection on the global temperature increase through the end of the 21st century, relative to 1990, based on the simulation of various emissions scenarios developed by the IPCC. Across all simulated scenarios, the lowest estimated temperature increase was 1.4 degrees Celsius (2.52 degrees Fahrenheit), and the highest was 5.8 degrees Celsius (10.44 degrees Fahrenheit).
“Given the fact that the United States produces approximately 25 percent of the total greenhouse gases emissions, the United States has a responsibility to cut its emissions of greenhouse gases,” Mr. McCain said in the record. “American companies now face the risk of being left out of the global marketplace to buy and sell emission reductions.”
“The Earth’s average temperature can be expected to rise between 2.5 and 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit during the next century,” Mr. Lieberman said in the record, citing the third assessment report. “Such a large, rapid rise in temperature will profoundly alter the Earth’s landscape in very practical terms.”
An innocent statement made by scientists can be misrepresented as “catastrophic” by politicians who then provide more funding for the scientific research in that field, which neither the science community nor the U.N. would object to, Mr. Lindzen said.
‘Science Is Never Settled’
“Those who claim that science is settled want to shut off all disagreement because they do not have much to present,” Mr. Lindzen said. “Science is never settled.”Politicians and non-scientists have often noticed that science has a certain authority with the public, and they want to co-opt it, so they bring in the term “the science,” Mr. Lindzen said. “But that isn’t what science is. … Science is a mode of inquiry,” he said.
It is always open to question; it depends on questions and on being wrong, the scientist pointed out. “When you say science cannot be wrong, you’ve choked off science.”
“Science isn’t a belief structure, it isn’t a cult, isn’t a religion.”
Today, it is almost impossible to publish a scientific paper that questions global warming, Mr. Lindzen said.
Scientific journals use referees as gatekeepers who can recommend major revisions to a paper questioning the climate narrative, the scientist explained. The revisions keep the author busy for a year, and then the paper gets rejected, he said. “Climate is one of the earliest examples of cancel culture.”
Mr. Lindzen said that he has a list of prominent scientists, such as lab directors, heads of weather bureaus, or international organizations, who were suppressed starting from the early 1990s.
On the other hand, “the funding for climate in total went up by about a factor of 15,” creating a new community that exists only because of the climate narrative, Mr.Lindzen said. As a result, no one in the mainstream media questions it.
To View the Original Article CLICK HERE
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
&
ControversiallyGreg@Gmail.com
& follow me on
follow me on
TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
&
https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW
FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100018379395297
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way
& I make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual.
.
NB:
Please Note that to aid clarity:
All material published in Blue Script
is either a URL Link
OR
Republished having been written by
Someone else, who I do try to identify for you
& where possible indicate a Link to the original.
Please Be Sure To
Follow me on some other sites
& spread the facts World Wide
The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK
Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW GL-W
GLW Documents
Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda!
As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022
Remove Tweet
Tweet 1 of 1
Violating one of our Rules.
Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW
They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor & #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf
Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM
By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.
If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.
PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!
follow me on:
TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
&
https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW
FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100018379395297
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY:
For any adverts that may follow this,
in text or at the end
which may well be inappropriate, biased,
propaganda or fraudulent
or even perhaps offensive.
I regret we have no control over adverts
or their number, which may be displayed!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~